2023 Report

Analysis: gender πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬

Reported median total compensation for the gender cohorts among Singapore survey respondents that meet the publication threshold, including a per-level pay gap breakdown and the experience mix behind the headline figure.

Published June 1, 2023 Β· Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam

Analysis: gender πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬

Reported medians by gender

Man respondents recorded median total compensation of S$123,000. Woman respondents recorded S$71,300, a 42% gap between the two published cohorts' raw medians. Other gender responses are omitted because each cohort falls below the publication threshold.

This is a cross-sectional, unadjusted comparison of two respondent cohorts, not a population-wide estimate or a matched-role analysis.

Chart proof

Median total compensation by gender

Reported median total compensation in SGD for the published gender cohorts among Singapore survey respondents. These survey medians are not population estimates. Cohorts below n=10 are suppressed.

View data table
Subgroup among Singapore survey respondents (n)Reported median total compensation (SGD), not a population estimate
Man (n=83) S$123,000
Woman (n=138) S$71,300

What the headline gap is made of

Much of that 42% reflects who is in each cohort, not unequal pay for the same work. Woman respondents in the Singapore cohort had a median of 3 years of design experience, against 7 years for Man respondents. Women in this survey are, on average, earlier in their careers, and career stage is one of the strongest predictors of pay in this dataset (see the experience analysis). The per-level breakdown below strips out most of that seniority mix, and it's the closer like-for-like read on the gap.

Pay gap by seniority level

Comparing medians within each seniority level, restricted to levels where both genders published, sharpens the picture. At Junior IC, men earned 11.85% less than women. From Mid-level IC upward the direction reverses:

  • Mid-level IC: women earned 11.32% less than men
  • Senior IC: women earned 21.1% less than men
  • People Manager: women earned 21.22% less than men

Of the two levels with a gap above 20%, Senior IC has the larger combined cohort (n=52, against n=23 at People Manager), so its 21.1% gap is the more reliable reading of the two.

Lead/Staff/Principal IC and Director levels aren't shown here. The Lead/Staff woman cohort (n=7) falls short of the publication threshold, and there's too little data at the Director level to say anything reliable about it.

Chart proof

Median pay by level and gender

Reported median total compensation by gender at each Singapore survey seniority level where both gender cohorts meet the n=10 publication threshold. Grouped bars show each gender's median side by side at each level. Lead/Staff/Principal IC and Director levels are omitted because at least one gender cohort in each falls below n=10.

View data table
Seniority levelMen median (S$)Men nWomen median (S$)Women n
Junior IC 47,6001054,00053
Mid-level IC 83,9002074,40035
Senior IC 133,15020105,05032
People Manager 151,38013119,25010

Negotiation and levelling

Men negotiated their current compensation more often than women, 61% against 51%, and reported more formal levelling progress over the past year, 62% against 52%. Both gaps sit alongside the per-level pay differences above, though this survey can't establish how much either behaviour contributes to outcomes.

Pay rises

Reported pay rises were broadly similar by gender across all six brackets (Men n=83, Women n=138). In the top bracket, more than 20%, 24.4% of men and 25.2% of women reported an increase: women's share was marginally higher. Rates of no increase at all were also close: 19.5% of men against 20.6% of women. Whatever is driving the per-level gaps above, it isn't a starkly unequal spread of rise sizes.

Chart proof

Pay-rise distribution by gender

Share of each gender cohort among Singapore survey respondents reporting a pay rise in each bracket over the past year. Men (n=83) and Women (n=138) are each read as a share of their own cohort, not a share of all respondents.

View data table
Pay-rise bracket, gender (n)Share of cohort reporting this rise
No increase, Men (n=83) 19.5%
No increase, Women (n=138) 20.6%
0.1–5%, Men (n=83) 19.5%
0.1–5%, Women (n=138) 18.3%
6–10%, Men (n=83) 15.9%
6–10%, Women (n=138) 16.0%
11–15%, Men (n=83) 12.2%
11–15%, Women (n=138) 9.9%
16–20%, Men (n=83) 8.5%
16–20%, Women (n=138) 9.9%
More than 20%, Men (n=83) 24.4%
More than 20%, Women (n=138) 25.2%

Sentiment by gender

The published report also compares sentiment by gender, covering things like perceived fairness of pay and job-search intent. That chart wasn't numerically labelled in the published report, so we don't reproduce specific figures here.

Source: Design Pay Asia 2022-23 survey data. Filtered to Singapore respondents paid in SGD (n=223).

Some cohorts here are too small to publish without identifying individuals, so we hold those figures back.

Read our data safety rules

Where this sits in the conversation

  1. Overview

    2023 report
  2. Landscape

    Demographics
  3. Landscape

    Roles and experience
  4. Landscape

    Compensation
  5. Landscape

    Company landscape
  6. Sentiments

    Sentiments: negotiations and pay
  7. Sentiments

    Sentiments: work setup
  8. Sentiments

    Sentiments: career progression
  9. Singapore deep dive

    Analysis: gender πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ you are here
  10. Singapore deep dive

    Analysis: experience πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
  11. Singapore deep dive

    Analysis: company πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
  12. Singapore deep dive

    Analysis: education πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
  13. Close

    The first count