2024 Report

Value of design

Perceptions of design

Published March 15, 2025 · Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand

Value of design

Designers across Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand see design's value differently depending on where they sit, and feeling valued does not track evenly with feeling fairly paid across the five markets.

Chart proof

I feel that my role is valued in my organisation

How designers across Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand feel their role is valued by their organisation. Default view is Indonesia, the region's largest sample; select a market to see its own figures.

View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Feels valued (ratings 5–7) 102373.7%
Does not feel valued (ratings 1–4) 36526.3%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Feels valued (ratings 5–7) 9053.3%
Does not feel valued (ratings 1–4) 7946.7%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Feels valued (ratings 5–7) 5156.0%
Does not feel valued (ratings 1–4) 4044.0%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Feels valued (ratings 5–7) 3366.0%
Does not feel valued (ratings 1–4) 1734.0%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Feels valued (ratings 5–7) 2558.1%
Does not feel valued (ratings 1–4) 1841.9%

Chart proof

I feel that my organisation genuinely prioritises user needs and experiences in our decisions

Designers' assessment of their organisation's commitment to user-centred decision-making, across Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Default view is Indonesia, the region's largest sample; select a market to see its own figures.

View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Strong user focus (ratings 5–7) 82759.7%
Weaker user focus (ratings 1–4) 55840.3%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Strong user focus (ratings 5–7) 7242.9%
Weaker user focus (ratings 1–4) 9657.1%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Strong user focus (ratings 5–7) 5054.9%
Weaker user focus (ratings 1–4) 4145.1%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Strong user focus (ratings 5–7) 2856.0%
Weaker user focus (ratings 1–4) 2244.0%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Strong user focus (ratings 5–7) 2455.8%
Weaker user focus (ratings 1–4) 1944.2%

Chart proof

Fair compensation perceptions

Designers' perception of fair compensation for their role and level, across Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Default view is Indonesia, the region's largest sample; select a market to see its own figures.

View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Fair (ratings 5–7) 70150.8%
Unfair (ratings 1–4) 67849.2%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Fair (ratings 5–7) 8349.1%
Unfair (ratings 1–4) 8650.9%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Fair (ratings 5–7) 4852.7%
Unfair (ratings 1–4) 4347.3%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Fair (ratings 5–7) 2755.1%
Unfair (ratings 1–4) 2244.9%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
Fair (ratings 5–7) 2865.1%
Unfair (ratings 1–4) 1534.9%

Design here is praised in principle and paid at a discount.

Chart proof

I have to put in extra effort to educate other cross-functional teams about design in order to do my job effectively

How often designers across Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand must advocate for design to cross-functional colleagues. Default view is Indonesia, the region's largest sample; select a market to see its own figures.

View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
High advocacy effort (ratings 5–7) 94468.5%
Lower advocacy effort (ratings 1–4) 43431.5%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
High advocacy effort (ratings 5–7) 11970.4%
Lower advocacy effort (ratings 1–4) 5029.6%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
High advocacy effort (ratings 5–7) 7076.9%
Lower advocacy effort (ratings 1–4) 2123.1%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
High advocacy effort (ratings 5–7) 3163.3%
Lower advocacy effort (ratings 1–4) 1836.7%
View data table
ResponseRespondents (n)Share
High advocacy effort (ratings 5–7) 3376.7%
Lower advocacy effort (ratings 1–4) 1023.3%

Even at the high end, two in five designers don't think user needs shape how their organisation actually decides things. That gap is the tension between what user-centred design claims and what the organisation actually rewards.

Philippines (n=7) and other markets below the 10-respondent disclosure threshold are not shown.

Read our data safety rules

Commentary

On the topic of showing the value of design to regional businesses, the gap between contribution and recognition holds up, though it narrows and widens differently market by market. Thailand is the outlier: the only market where designers feel more fairly paid than valued.

  • Designers across the region spend energy justifying design's worth to cross-functional teams, time that could otherwise go towards deeper, more strategic work.
  • What counts as "good design" still differs from business to business. Mature companies tend to focus on getting the work done well rather than following a fixed framework, and they judge design's success in varied ways: return on investment, strategic value, customer satisfaction, and brand impact.

What this means for you

If you're a designer

  • Find ways to balance showing the value of design with your main work — picking your battles.
  • Look for business numbers that show how your work makes a difference, considering investing in soft skills and peripheral knowledge.

If you're leading a team or organisation

  • How do you get the rest of the business to see design as strategy?
  • Think about ways to show the value of design without putting too much pressure on individual designers.
  • Check if chasing design maturity actually helps your business goals.
  • Consider what success looks like for design in your specific business.
Evidence and further reading

Evidence used in this section

  • Regional design value: role value, user-centricity, advocacy effort, and compensation fairness

    Across designers in Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand: 53.3%-73.7% feel their role is valued in their organisation (ratings 5-7). 42.9%-59.7% say their organisation genuinely prioritises user needs. 49.1%-65.1% feel fairly compensated for their role and level. 63.3%-76.9% invest significant extra effort educating cross-functional teams about design. Philippines (n=7) and other markets below the 10-respondent disclosure threshold are excluded.

    2024-value-of-design · aggregate-only

  • Singapore design value: role value, user-centricity, advocacy effort, and compensation fairness

    Among Singapore designers: 53.3% feel their role is valued (ratings 5-7 of 169 valid responses). 42.9% say their organisation genuinely prioritises user needs (of 168 valid responses). 70.4% invest significant extra effort educating cross-functional teams about design (of 169 valid responses). 49.1% feel fairly compensated for their role and level, while 50.9% do not (of 169 valid responses).

    2024-sg-value-design · small-cohort

Further reading and context

Questions worth exploring

How can designers across the region help others see design as strategic work?

Worth exploring next

  • Should we focus on formal frameworks or practical business needs?
  • Should proving the value of design be someone's specific job rather than everyone's extra work?
  • How can companies measure the value of design simply and effectively?

Where this sits in the conversation

  1. Overview

    2024 report
  2. Landscape

    Demographics
  3. Landscape

    Roles & experiences
  4. Landscape

    Compensation
  5. Landscape

    Company landscape
  6. Sentiments

    Offer & negotiation
  7. Sentiments

    Career progression
  8. Sentiments

    Value of design you are here
  9. Sentiments

    Job market
  10. Singapore deep dive

    Singapore deep dive
  11. Close

    The conversation continues